Cross-disciplinary method development for assessing dog welfare in canine-assisted pedagogical work: a pilot study.

Research on so-called social service dogs' welfare in schools is scarce and tends to suffer from positive bias; i.e., lacking critical approaches to claimed welfare benefits for dogs. To contribute method development for studying effects on dogs in pedagogical work, we applied and evaluated a combination of four data collection methods: Ethogram, Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA), ethnographic observations, and interviews with dog-handling pedagogues. We followed pedagogues (n = 5) and their dogs (n = 8) in their daily work, observing 16 canine-assisted sessions in total at five different schools. Follow-up semi-structured interviews were carried out with all pedagogues. Our findings suggest combining either ethogram or QBA with ethnographic data that gives contextual information on the events causing the dog's behavior. The method choice will, ultimately, depend on study design, but the specific premises of QBA seem to work particularly well with ethnography. We further suggest a shift from simultaneous (parallel) to synchronous (connected) documentation of data. To minimize anthropocentric bias and power arrangements involved in animal welfare research, it is necessary to critically scrutinize accepted conventions regarding social service dogs and their work situation.

Droplet digital PCR for absolute quantification of proviral load of human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) types 1 and 2.

BACKGROUND: Human T-lymphotrophic virus (HTLV) types 1 and 2 cause lifelong infection whereby most infected individuals are asymptomatic whilst a minority develop infection-related disease. These latter patients invariably have been found to have high proviral load (PVL). Therefore, infected patients are monitored by determining the proportion of lymphocytes that are infected with HTLV-1/2. An increase in PVL has been shown to represent an increasing risk of developing HTLV-associated diseases. Monitoring of PVL requires a reliable and sensitive method. In this study assays based on droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) were established and evaluated for detection and quantification of HTLV-1/2. OBJECTIVES: To develop two parallel assays to detect the tax genes and determine the PVL of HTLV-1 and -2. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-seven clinical samples from patients infected with HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 were analysed. The samples had previously been analysed with a qPCR and a comparison between ddPCR and qPCR was performed. The specificity of the assays were determined by analyzing samples from 20 healthy blood donors. RESULTS: The ddPCR was a stable and sensitive method for detection and quantification of HTLV-1 and -2. When comparing the qPCR and ddPCR the correlation was high (Pearsons correlation coefficient 0.96). The variability of the ddPCR was very low with intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.97-3.3% (HTLV-1) and 1.7-8.2% (HTLV-2) and inter-assay CV of 1.8-6.1% (HTLV-1) and 1.2-12.9% (HTLV-2). CONCLUSIONS: The ddPCR reliably quantified HTLV DNA in clinical samples and could be a useful tool for monitoring of PVLs in HTLV-infected individuals.

Prevalence of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 and 2 infection in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence data on human T-lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/2) in Sweden have not been updated since 1995. The seroprevalence among blood donors at that time was 0.2/10,000. A few years earlier, a high prevalence of HTLV-2 was found in intravenous drug users (IDUs) in Stockholm (3.4%). The objective of this study was to update information on the seroprevalence of HTLV in several study groups. METHODS: Serum samples from pregnant women, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive individuals, and IDUs in Stockholm were investigated for HTLV-1/2 antibodies. Data from the mandatory HTLV-1/2 screening (2003-2006) of in vitro fertilization (IVF) clients were compiled, as well as data from new blood donors. RESULTS: Eight out of 35,000 IVF patients were positive for anti-HTLV-1/2 (seroprevalence 2.3 per 10,000). Of the anti-HCV-positive individuals (n = 355), 1 sample was HTLV-1-positive (28.2 per 10,000). From 1995 to 2007, 18 HTLV-positive new blood donors were identified out of approximately 550,000 individuals tested (0.3 per 10,000). Thirty-five of 1079 tested IDUs were screening reactive. CONCLUSIONS: Since the start of screening in 1994, there has been no increased seroprevalence of HTLV-1/2 among blood donors in Sweden. Seroprevalence among Swedish IVF patients is 10 times higher than among blood donors. This finding is comparable to a 2003 European seroprevalence study of pregnant women in 7 countries. However, the possibility that the IVF group includes individuals with a higher risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections, including HTLV, than the general population cannot be ruled out.

Evaluation of a new screening assay for HTLV-1 and -2 antibodies for large-scale use.

Laboratory testing for Human T-lymphotropic Virus type 1 and 2 (HTLV-1 and -2) infections has become routine in blood transfusion, tissue transplantation and clinical diagnoses in many countries worldwide. Screening is usually based on the detection of antibodies to HTLV-1 and/ or -2. The number of commercially available assays is limited, and among them, ELISA tests based on microtiter format are most commonly used. Recently, the new rHTLV-I/II assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) was released; this assay was developed for an automatic large-scale screening platform. This assay was evaluated using pre-characterized serum panels and routine samples from the clinical laboratory. The sensitivity was 100% for HTLV-1 and -2 (99/99 and 42/42, respectively, including one sample that was dually reactive, HTLV-1 + 2). To test assay specificity, panels of blood donor sera, specimens from patients with autoimmune diseases and some viral infections were used. False-reactive samples from previous HTLV diagnoses were also included. With these panels, the specificity was 99.4% (619/623). However, the four false-reactive samples all belonged to the group of samples that were previously considered as false-reactive for HTLV-antibodies. All other samples were negative by the rHTLV-I/II assay, and thus 100% specificity was obtained. The 1,412 samples tested in the clinic by this assay in routine use were all negative (100% specificity). Taken together, the overall specificity was 99.8%. The assay was sensitive, specific and appropriate for the large-scale screening of samples for HTLV-1/2 antibodies.